Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing contemporary Arctic habitat availability for a woolly mammoth proxy.

Jessie Poquérusse, Casey Lance Brown, Camille Gaillard, Chris Doughty, Love Dalén, Austin J Gallagher, Matthew Wooller, Nikita Zimov, George M Church, Ben Lamm and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessie Poquérusse *Colossal Biosciences Inc, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
Casey Lance Brown *Colossal Biosciences Inc, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
Camille GaillardSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Chris DoughtySchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Love DalénDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Austin J GallagherBeneath The Waves, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Matthew WoollerCollege of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA.
Nikita ZimovNorth-East Science Station, Pacific Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chersky, Russia.
George M ChurchColossal Biosciences Inc, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
Ben LammColossal Biosciences Inc, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. ben@colossal.com.
Eriona HysolliColossal Biosciences Inc, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. eriona@colossal.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest continues to grow in Arctic megafaunal ecological engineering, but, since the mass extinction of megafauna ~ 12-15 ka, key physiographic variables and available forage continue to change. Here we sought to assess the extent to which contemporary Arctic ecosystems are conducive to the rewilding of megaherbivores, using a woolly mammoth (M. primigenius) proxy as a model species. We first perform a literature review on woolly mammoth dietary habits. We then leverage Oak Ridge National Laboratories Distributive Active Archive Center Global Aboveground and Belowground Biomass Carbon Density Maps to generate aboveground biomass carbon density estimates in plant functional types consumed by the woolly mammoth at 300 m resolution on Alaska's North Slope. We supplement these analyses with a NASA Arctic Boreal Vulnerability Experiment dataset to downgrade overall biomass estimates to digestible levels. We further downgrade available forage by using a conversion factor representing the relationship between total biomass and net primary productivity (NPP) for arctic vegetation types. Integrating these estimates with the forage needs of woolly mammoths, we conservatively estimate Alaska's North Slope could support densities of 0.0-0.38 woolly mammoth km

Indexed as

BiomassEcosystemMammothsAlaskaAnimalsArctic RegionsCarbonCarbonBiomassCarrying capacityEcological engineeringRemote sensingWoolly mammoth proxy

Identifiers

PMID38684726
PMCPMC11058768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.