ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring inertial sensor-based balance biomarkers for early detection of mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stage-Wise IoT Solutions for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Detection, Monitoring, and Assistive Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable sensing for quantifying cognitive and balance functions in naturalistic movements of older adults with mild cognitive impairment in therapeutic environments.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A comprehensive guide to digital neurology. An update on current development on digital neurology derived from the Digital Neuro Hub project.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- The Potential of Automated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using Non-Neuroimaging Data: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia is characterized by a progressive loss of cognitive abilities, and diagnosing its early stages Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), is difficult since it is a transitory state that is different from total cognitive collapse. Recent clinical research studies have identified that balance impairments can be a significant indicator for predicting dementia in older adults. Accordingly, the current research focuses on finding innovative postural balance-based digital biomarkers by using wearable inertial sensors and pre-screening of MCI in home settings using machine learning techniques. For this research, sixty subjects (30 cognitively normal and 30 MCI) with waist-mounted inertial sensor performed balance tasks in four different standing postures: eyes-open, eyes-closed, right-leg-lift, and left-leg-lift. The significant balance biomarkers for MCI identification are discovered by our research, demonstrating specific characteristics in each of these four states. A robust feature selection approach is ensured by the multi-step methodology that combines the strengths of Filter techniques, Wrapper methods, and SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) technique. The proposed balance biomarkers have the potential to detect MCI (with 75.8% accuracy), as evidenced by the results of machine learning algorithms for classification. This work adds to the growing body of literature targeted at enhancing understanding and proactive management of cognitive loss in older populations and lays the groundwork for future research efforts aimed at refining digital biomarkers, validating findings, and exploring longitudinal perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.