Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684665›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Antigen presentation plays positive roles in the regenerative response to cardiac injury in zebrafish.

João Cardeira-da-Silva, Qianchen Wang, Pooja Sagvekar, Janita Mintcheva, Stephan Latting, Stefan Günther, Radhan Ramadass, Michail Yekelchyk, Jens Preussner, Mario Looso and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Valve biology and rheumatic heart disease pathogenesis.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Immune-mediated cardiac development and regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Cardeira-da-SilvaDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany. joao.cardeira-da-silva@mpi-bn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-8810
Qianchen WangDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Pooja SagvekarDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-3806
Janita MintchevaMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan LattingDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Stefan GüntherDZHK German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Bad Nauheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-4549
Radhan RamadassDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Michail YekelchykCardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Jens PreussnerCardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Mario LoosoDZHK German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Bad Nauheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-9530
Jan Philipp JunkerMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-8290
Didier Y R StainierDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany. didier.stainier@mpi-bn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0382-0026
Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to adult mammals, adult zebrafish can fully regenerate injured cardiac tissue, and this regeneration process requires an adequate and tightly controlled immune response. However, which components of the immune response are required during regeneration is unclear. Here, we report positive roles for the antigen presentation-adaptive immunity axis during zebrafish cardiac regeneration. We find that following the initial innate immune response, activated endocardial cells (EdCs), as well as immune cells, start expressing antigen presentation genes. We also observe that T helper cells, a.k.a. Cd4

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationHeart InjuriesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIRegenerationZebrafishAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationHeartImmunity, InnateMiceMutationMyocytes, CardiacAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIinvariant chainZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38684665
PMCPMC11058276
OpenAlexW4396214417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.