Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684646›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2024

A global meta-analysis on the drivers of salt marsh planting success and implications for ecosystem services.

Zezheng Liu, Sergio Fagherazzi, Qiang He, Olivier Gourgue, Junhong Bai, Xinhui Liu, Chiyuan Miao, Zhan Hu, Baoshan Cui

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recommendations for the development of erosion-resistant tidal marshes to enhance nature-based flood risk mitigation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The contribution of increased global soil salinity to changes in inorganic carbon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plant species, inundation, and sediment grain size control the development of sediment stability in tidal marshes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Unfriendly neighbors: When facilitation does not contribute to restoration success in tidal marsh.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zezheng LiuState Key Laboratory of Water Environmental Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-4621
Sergio FagherazziDepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Massachusetts, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-5968
Qiang HeCoastal Ecology Lab, MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Olivier GourgueOperational Directorate Natural Environment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0022-3637
Junhong BaiState Key Laboratory of Water Environmental Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-2143
Xinhui LiuState Key Laboratory of Water Environmental Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Chiyuan MiaoState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-7020
Zhan HuSchool of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, China. huzh9@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-3718
Baoshan CuiState Key Laboratory of Water Environmental Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China. cuibs@bnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-2295

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U2243208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planting has been widely adopted to battle the loss of salt marshes and to establish living shorelines. However, the drivers of success in salt marsh planting and their ecological effects are poorly understood at the global scale. Here, we assemble a global database, encompassing 22,074 observations reported in 210 studies, to examine the drivers and impacts of salt marsh planting. We show that, on average, 53% of plantings survived globally, and plant survival and growth can be enhanced by careful design of sites, species selection, and novel planted technologies. Planting enhances shoreline protection, primary productivity, soil carbon storage, biodiversity conservation and fishery production (effect sizes = 0.61, 1.55, 0.21, 0.10 and 1.01, respectively), compared with degraded wetlands. However, the ecosystem services of planted marshes, except for shoreline protection, have not yet fully recovered compared with natural wetlands (effect size = -0.25, 95% CI -0.29, -0.22). Fortunately, the levels of most ecological functions related to climate change mitigation and biodiversity increase with plantation age when compared with natural wetlands, and achieve equivalence to natural wetlands after 5-25 years. Overall, our results suggest that salt marsh planting could be used as a strategy to enhance shoreline protection, biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesWetlandsCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeEcosystemFisheriesPlantsSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID38684646
PMCPMC11059165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.