Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684595›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2024

Collaborative Recognition of Wellbeing Needs: A Novel Approach to Universal Psychosocial Screening on the Neonatal Unit.

Davy Evans, Daisy Eatwell, Shevonne Hodson-Walker, Sarah Pearce, Vicky Reynolds, Shona Smith, Leah Whitehouse, Ruth Butterworth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Davy EvansBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. davy.evans@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-3018-9962
Daisy EatwellBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Shevonne Hodson-WalkerBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah PearceBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Vicky ReynoldsBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Shona SmithBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Leah WhitehouseBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ruth ButterworthNorth West Neonatal Operational Delivery Network, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal screening for the psychological needs of families in neonatal care is internationally recommended, but is not routinely practiced in the United Kingdom (UK). The present quality improvement project explores the clinical and operational feasibility of a novel approach to universal screening on a neonatal intensive care unit in the UK. The approach to screening taken adopts collaborative, strengths-based and dialogical methods for recognising the psychological needs of families whose baby is in hospital. A novel screening tool, developed through consultation with families, is described. Over one month, 42 out of 80 eligible families engaged with the screening protocol either at admission to the unit, transition to the special care nursery within the unit, or discharge home, with completion rates higher at admission than discharge. This led to an eightfold increase in the number of families accessing targeted or specialist psychological intervention compared to the period prior to this pilot. This project demonstrates the need for adequate capacity in the workforce to carry out a screening programme and to respond to the needs identified.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalMass ScreeningFamilyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeeds AssessmentPilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementUnited KingdomCollaborationFamily Integrated CareNeonatalPsychological needsScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.