Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684586›Full record

ArticleInfection2024

Epidemiological trends and susceptibility patterns of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. in six German university hospitals: a prospectively evaluated multicentre cohort study from 2016 to 2020 of the R-Net study group.

Daniel Hornuss, Siri Göpel, Sarah V Walker, David Tobys, Georg Häcker, Harald Seifert, Paul G Higgins, Kyriaki Xanthopoulou, Beryl Primrose Gladstone, Chiara Cattaneo and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ManagingEClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Genomic epidemiology ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Autism-Associated Gut Microbiota-DerivedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Daniel HornussDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. daniel.hornuss@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Siri GöpelDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Sarah V WalkerDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
David TobysDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Georg HäckerInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Harald SeifertDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Paul G HigginsDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Kyriaki XanthopoulouDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Beryl Primrose GladstoneDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Chiara CattaneoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander MischnikDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Anna M RohdeDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Can ImirzaliogluDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Janina TrauthDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Moritz FritzenwankerDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Jane FalgenhauerDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Petra GastmeierDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Michael BehnkeDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Evelyn KrammeDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Nadja KädingDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Jan RuppDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Silke PeterDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Kristina SchmauderDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Simone EisenbeisDZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Winfried V KernDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Evelina Tacconelli *DZIF German Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany.
Siegbert Rieg *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
DZIF R.-N. E. T. Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse recent epidemiological trends of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Enterococcus spp. In adult patients admitted to tertiary care centres in Germany.

methodsEpidemiological data from the multicentre R-NET study was analysed. Patients presenting with E. faecium or E. faecalis in blood cultures in six German tertiary care university hospitals between October 2016 and June 2020 were prospectively evaluated. In vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), the presence of vanA/vanB was confirmed via molecular methods.

resultsIn the 4-year study period, 3001 patients with BSI due to Enterococcus spp. were identified. E. faecium was detected in 1830 patients (61%) and E. faecalis in 1229 patients (41%). Most BSI occurred in (sub-) specialties of internal medicine. The pooled incidence density of enterococcal BSI increased significantly (4.0-4.5 cases per 10,000 patient days), which was primarily driven by VRE BSI (0.5 to 1.0 cases per 10,000 patient days). In 2020, the proportion of VRE BSI was > 12% in all study sites (range, 12.8-32.2%). Molecular detection of resistance in 363 VRE isolates showed a predominance of the vanB gene (77.1%).

conclusionThis large multicentre study highlights an increase of BSI due to E. faecium, which was primarily driven by VRE. The high rates of hospital- and ICU-acquired VRE BSI point towards an important role of prior antibiotic exposure and invasive procedures as risk factors. Due to limited treatment options and high mortality rates of VRE BSI, the increasing incidence of VRE BSI is of major concern.

Indexed as

BacteremiaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospitals, UniversityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCross InfectionEnterococcusEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infectionE. faecalisE. faeciumEnterococcusVRE

Identifiers

PMID38684586
PMCPMC11499396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.