Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684559›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training and beyond: a reinforcement learning exploration and benchmark.

Ivan Ovinnikov, Ami Beuret, Flavia Cavaliere, Joachim M Buhmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivan Ovinnikov *Department of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. ivan.ovinnikov@inf.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0855-7156
Ami Beuret *Department of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Flavia CavaliereDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joachim M BuhmannDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung 28640.1 IP-ICT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis work presents FASTRL, a benchmark set of instrument manipulation tasks adapted to the domain of reinforcement learning and used in simulated surgical training. This benchmark enables and supports the design and training of human-centric reinforcement learning agents which assist and evaluate human trainees in surgical practice.

methodsSimulation tasks from the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) program are adapted to the reinforcement learning setting for the purpose of training virtual agents that are capable of providing assistance and scoring to the surgical trainees. A skill performance assessment protocol is presented based on the trained virtual agents.

resultsThe proposed benchmark suite presents an API for training reinforcement learning agents in the context of arthroscopic skill training. The evaluation scheme based on both heuristic and learned reward functions robustly recovers the ground truth ranking on a diverse test set of human trajectories.

conclusionThe presented benchmark enables the exploration of a novel reinforcement learning-based approach to skill performance assessment and in-procedure assistance for simulated surgical training scenarios. The evaluation protocol based on the learned reward model demonstrates potential for evaluating the performance of surgical trainees in simulation.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBenchmarkingClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansReinforcement, PsychologySimulation TrainingBenchmarkComputer-assisted interventionReinforcement LearningSimulationSurgical evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38684559
PMCPMC11365860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.