Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684467›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2024

Diving into drug-screening: zebrafish embryos as an in vivo platform for antimicrobial drug discovery and assessment.

Eva Habjan, Gina K Schouten, Alexander Speer, Peter van Ulsen, Wilbert Bitter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cystic fibrosis: insights from zebrafish models.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Zebrafish larvae swim bladder serves as a model to studyMycobacteria (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Zebrafish: A Versatile and Powerful Model for Biomedical Research.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Drug Repurposing: An Emerging Strategy inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Emerging Frontiers in Zebrafish Embryonic and Adult-Derived Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Natterin bridges IFN-φ1 and non-canonical inflammasome pathways viaFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva HabjanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center,De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0613-8564
Gina K SchoutenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center,De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-0685-9151
Alexander SpeerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center,De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7142-5987
Peter van UlsenSection Molecular Microbiology of A-LIFE, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-1611
Wilbert BitterDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center,De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-6511

Funding

NWO TTW-NACTAR-16445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria underlines the need for innovative treatments, yet the introduction of new drugs has stagnated despite numerous antimicrobial discoveries. A major hurdle is a poor correlation between promising in vitro data and in vivo efficacy in animal models, which is essential for clinical development. Early in vivo testing is hindered by the expense and complexity of existing animal models. Therefore, there is a pressing need for cost-effective, rapid preclinical models with high translational value. To overcome these challenges, zebrafish embryos have emerged as an attractive model for infectious disease studies, offering advantages such as ethical alignment, rapid development, ease of maintenance, and genetic manipulability. The zebrafish embryo infection model, involving microinjection or immersion of pathogens and potential antibiotic hit compounds, provides a promising solution for early-stage drug screening. It offers a cost-effective and rapid means of assessing the efficacy, toxicity and mechanism of action of compounds in a whole-organism context. This review discusses the experimental design of this model, but also its benefits and challenges. Additionally, it highlights recently identified compounds in the zebrafish embryo infection model and discusses the relevance of the model in predicting the compound's clinical potential.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEmbryo, NonmammalianZebrafishAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDisease Models, AnimalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsanimal modelsantimicrobialsDanio reriodrug screeninginfection modelszebrafish embryo

Identifiers

PMID38684467
PMCPMC11078164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.