Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684375›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024

Impact of lens autofluorescence and opacification on retinal imaging.

Leon von der Emde, Geena C Rennen, Marc Vaisband, Jan Hasenauer, Raffael Liegl, Monika Fleckenstein, Maximilian Pfau, Frank G Holz, Thomas Ach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leon von der EmdeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, NRW, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-2630-3732
Geena C RennenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, NRW, Germany.
Marc VaisbandLife & Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Jan HasenauerLife & Medical Sciences Institute, Bonn, Germany.
Raffael LieglDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, NRW, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6352-6259
Monika FleckensteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, NRW, Germany.
Maximilian PfauInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas AchDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, NRW, Germany Thomas.Ach@ukbonn.de.

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jun Yang · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
A hyperspectral approach to RPE fluorophores in AMDR01EY027948 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ACH, THOMAS, CURCIO, CHRISTINE A · 2017 to 2025
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal imaging, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), strongly depends on the clearness of the optical media. Lens status is crucial since the ageing lens has both light-blocking and autofluorescence (AF) properties that distort image analysis. Here, we report both lens opacification and AF metrics and the effect on automated image quality assessment.

methods227 subjects (range: 19-89 years old) received quantitative AF of the lens (LQAF), Scheimpflug, anterior chamber optical coherence tomography as well as blue/green FAF (BAF/GAF), and infrared (IR) imaging. LQAF values, the Pentacam Nucleus Staging score and the relative lens reflectivity were extracted to estimate lens opacification. Mean opinion scores of FAF and IR image quality were compiled by medical readers. A regression model for predicting image quality was developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Correlation analysis was conducted to assess the association of lens scores, with retinal image quality derived from human or CNN annotations.

resultsRetinal image quality was generally high across all imaging modalities (IR (8.25±1.99) >GAF >BAF (6.6±3.13)). CNN image quality prediction was excellent (average mean absolute error (MAE) 0.9). Predictions were comparable to human grading. Overall, LQAF showed the highest correlation with image quality grading criteria for all imaging modalities (eg, Pearson correlation±CI -0.35 (-0.50 to 0.18) for BAF/LQAF). BAF image quality was most vulnerable to an increase in lenticular metrics, while IR (-0.19 (-0.38 to 0.01)) demonstrated the highest resilience.

conclusionThe use of CNN-based retinal image quality assessment achieved excellent results. The study highlights the vulnerability of BAF to lenticular remodelling. These results can aid in the development of cut-off values for clinical studies, ensuring reliable data collection for the monitoring of retinal diseases.

Indexed as

CataractTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansLens, CrystallineMaleMiddle AgedOptical ImagingRetinaYoung AdultImagingLens and zonulesMaculaRetina

Identifiers

PMID38684375
PMCPMC11086461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.