Trial reportHormone research in paediatrics2025
Unstimulated Luteinizing Hormone for Assessment of Suppression during Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty with 6-Month Subcutaneous Leuprolide Acetate: Correlations with Clinical Response.
Trial report in Hormone research in paediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of 24-weekly vs 12-weekly decapeptyl SR treatment in central precocious puberty: a UK multicentre retrospective cohort study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Critical appraisal of diagnostic laboratory tests in the evaluation of central precocious puberty.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhase 3 trial of 6-month subcutaneous leuprolide acetate (SC-LA) in children with central precocious puberty (CPP) demonstrated efficacy and safety. The aims of this secondary analysis were to evaluate unstimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) as efficacy measure, assess clinical suppression metrics, and present biochemical and clinical data for subgroups not achieving hormone suppression.
methodsSixty-two children with treatment-naïve CPP received 2 doses of 45 mg SC-LA at 24-week intervals. Unstimulated and GnRH-stimulated LH, E
resultsEighty-four percentage and 86% of children achieved unstimulated LH <1 IU/L at weeks 24 and 48, respectively. Of 8 children not achieving unstimulated LH <1 IU/L at week 24 that completed the study, all showed a lack of pubertal stage progression and stable/decreased BA to chronological age ratio (BA/CA). Received operating characteristic (ROC) analyses suggested unstimulated LH is a good diagnostic predictor of GnRH-stimulated LH <4 IU/L at weeks 24 and 48 (AUC = 0.88). Across all children, mean BA/CA improved from 1.4 (screening) to 1.3 (week 48) and mean PAH increased by 3 cm. Of 7 girls not achieving stimulated LH <4 IU/L at week 24, all achieved E
conclusionUnstimulated LH has value as an efficacy measure and concentrations <1 IU/L may be an adequate surrogate of treatment response in children with CPP. All children who completed the study had evidence of pubertal suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.