Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683991›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Indirect reciprocity undermines indirect reciprocity destabilizing large-scale cooperation.

Eric Schnell, Michael Muthukrishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reply to Gross et al.: Indirect reciprocity undermines large-scale cooperation under realistic conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Indirect reciprocity can foster large-scale cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric SchnellDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-5763
Michael MuthukrishnaDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-5166

Funding

Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF) 0620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous models suggest that indirect reciprocity (reputation) can stabilize large-scale human cooperation [K. Panchanathan, R. Boyd,

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGame TheoryHumansInterpersonal RelationsModels, Psychologicalcooperationcultural evolutionevolutionary game theoryindirect reciprocity

Identifiers

PMID38683991
PMCPMC11087788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.