Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683881›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Ensemble learning and ground-truth validation of synaptic connectivity inferred from spike trains.

Christian Donner, Julian Bartram, Philipp Hornauer, Taehoon Kim, Damian Roqueiro, Andreas Hierlemann, Guillaume Obozinski, Manuel Schröter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian DonnerSwiss Data Science Center, ETH Zürich & EPFL, Zürich & Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4499-2895
Julian BartramDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Philipp HornauerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Taehoon KimDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Damian RoqueiroDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas HierlemannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3838-2468
Guillaume ObozinskiSwiss Data Science Center, ETH Zürich & EPFL, Zürich & Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manuel SchröterDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9347-9203

Funding

European Research Council Advanced Grant 694829Swiss Data Science Center project C18-10,two Cantons of Basel through a Personalized Medicine PMB-01-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probing the architecture of neuronal circuits and the principles that underlie their functional organization remains an important challenge of modern neurosciences. This holds true, in particular, for the inference of neuronal connectivity from large-scale extracellular recordings. Despite the popularity of this approach and a number of elaborate methods to reconstruct networks, the degree to which synaptic connections can be reconstructed from spike-train recordings alone remains controversial. Here, we provide a framework to probe and compare connectivity inference algorithms, using a combination of synthetic ground-truth and in vitro data sets, where the connectivity labels were obtained from simultaneous high-density microelectrode array (HD-MEA) and patch-clamp recordings. We find that reconstruction performance critically depends on the regularity of the recorded spontaneous activity, i.e., their dynamical regime, the type of connectivity, and the amount of available spike-train data. We therefore introduce an ensemble artificial neural network (eANN) to improve connectivity inference. We train the eANN on the validated outputs of six established inference algorithms and show how it improves network reconstruction accuracy and robustness. Overall, the eANN demonstrated strong performance across different dynamical regimes, worked well on smaller datasets, and improved the detection of synaptic connectivity, especially inhibitory connections. Results indicated that the eANN also improved the topological characterization of neuronal networks. The presented methodology contributes to advancing the performance of inference algorithms and facilitates our understanding of how neuronal activity relates to synaptic connectivity.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlgorithmsModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsSynapsesAnimalsComputational BiologyMachine LearningMicroelectrodesNerve NetPatch-Clamp TechniquesRats

Identifiers

PMID38683881
PMCPMC11081509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.