Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683879›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

UNNT: A novel Utility for comparing Neural Net and Tree-based models.

Vineeth Gutta, Satish Ranganathan Ganakammal, Sara Jones, Matthew Beyers, Sunita Chandrasekaran

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vineeth GuttaDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1382-8128
Satish Ranganathan GanakammalCancer Science Data Initiatives, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2534-7548
Sara JonesCancer Science Data Initiatives, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Matthew BeyersCancer Science Data Initiatives, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-6429
Sunita ChandrasekaranDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3560-9428

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI PENDLETON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024ORFDO NIH HHS 75N99019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of deep learning (DL) is steadily gaining traction in scientific challenges such as cancer research. Advances in enhanced data generation, machine learning algorithms, and compute infrastructure have led to an acceleration in the use of deep learning in various domains of cancer research such as drug response problems. In our study, we explored tree-based models to improve the accuracy of a single drug response model and demonstrate that tree-based models such as XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) have advantages over deep learning models, such as a convolutional neural network (CNN), for single drug response problems. However, comparing models is not a trivial task. To make training and comparing CNNs and XGBoost more accessible to users, we developed an open-source library called UNNT (A novel Utility for comparing Neural Net and Tree-based models). The case studies, in this manuscript, focus on cancer drug response datasets however the application can be used on datasets from other domains, such as chemistry.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMachine LearningSoftwareAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID38683879
PMCPMC11090265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.