Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683867›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2024

The optimal dosage of aspirin for preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: A network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials.

Xuemei Hu, Dexin Chen, Hong Wang, Yinfeng Lv, Yulong Wang, Xuelin Gao, Shuwen Li, Rongxia He

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Role of gut microbiota and trimethylamineAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuemei HuDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Dexin ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Hong WangDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Yinfeng LvDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Yulong WangDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Xuelin GaoDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Shuwen LiDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Rongxia HeDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.ORCID 0009-0001-8456-4211

Funding

Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital CY2020-MS17Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation 20JR0RA731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and optimal dosage of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women. Traditional and network meta-analyses were conducted on data from 23 randomized controlled trials involving 10 547 pregnant women. The findings demonstrated that aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of preeclampsia (OR = 0.66, 95%CI [0.58, 0.75]), with the best preventive effect observed at a dosage of 80-100 mg/day (OR = 0.51, 95%CI [0.36, 0.72]). No significant differences were found in the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage (OR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.79, 1.33]), small for gestational age (OR = 0.83, 95%CI [0.50, 1.35]), placental abruption (OR = 0.96, 95%CI [0.53, 1.73]), and intrauterine growth restriction (OR = 0.63, 95%CI [0.45, 1.86]) between women taking aspirin and those taking placebos. Different doses of aspirin showed a reduction in preeclampsia incidence, but there was no significant difference in efficacy between the dosage groups. Side effects did not significantly differ between placebo and different aspirin dosage groups. SUCRA analysis suggested that 80-100 mg/day may be the optimal dosage, prioritizing both effectiveness and minimizing side effects. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. However, improvements are needed in addressing issues like loss to follow-up, reporting bias, and publication bias. In conclusion, a dosage of 80-100 mg/day is recommended for preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women, although individual circumstances should be considered for optimizing the balance between effectiveness and safety.

Indexed as

AspirinPre-EclampsiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIncidencePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskAspirinPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsaspirinhigh‐risknetwork meta‐analysisoptimal dosagepreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID38683867
PMCPMC11088435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.