Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683726›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2024

Representing Context and Priority in Working Memory.

Quan Wan, Adel Ardalan, Jacqueline M Fulvio, Bradley R Postle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence for Abstract Codes in Parietal Cortex Guiding Prospective Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quan WanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Adel ArdalanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute.
Jacqueline M FulvioUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Bradley R PostleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Investigating Cognitive &Neural Bases of Working MemoryR01MH064498 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POSTLE, BRADLEY R · 2003 to 2020
$6.7M
Controlling the Contents of Working MemoryR01MH131678 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BRADLEY R POSTLE · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NIH HHS MH064498NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064498NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to prioritize among contents in working memory (WM) is critical for successful control of thought and behavior. Recent work has demonstrated that prioritization in WM can be implemented by representing different states of priority in different representational formats. Here, we explored the mechanisms underlying WM prioritization by simulating the double serial retrocuing task with recurrent neural networks. Visualization of stimulus representational dynamics using principal component analysis revealed that the network represented trial context (order of presentation) and priority via different mechanisms. Ordinal context, a stable property lasting the duration of the trial, was accomplished by segregating representations into orthogonal subspaces. Priority, which changed multiple times during a trial, was accomplished by separating representations into different strata within each subspace. We assessed the generality of these mechanisms by applying dimensionality reduction and multiclass decoding to fMRI and EEG data sets and found that priority and context are represented differently along the dorsal visual stream and that behavioral performance is sensitive to trial-by-trial variability of priority coding, but not context coding.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Short-TermAdultBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38683726
PMCPMC12147455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.