Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683660›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nurses' knowledge on trauma and emergency care and associated factors in Ghanaian district hospitals.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Luiza DalloraDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-017X
Ewa Kazimiera AnderssonDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4282-8901
Bruna Gregory PalmDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-9927
Doris BohmanDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-7894
Gunilla BjörlingSchool of Health and Wellfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-900X
Ludmiła MarcinowiczFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-1093
Louise StjernbergDepartment of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-5109
Peter AnderbergDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-8477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.

methodsNursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.

resultsIn total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ

conclusionsThis study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14643.

Indexed as

Students, NursingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePolandSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenYoung AdulteHealthmobile phonenursing educationtechnology anxietytechnology enthusiasmtechnophilia

Identifiers

PMID38683660
PMCPMC11091804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.