Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683608›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Barriers to Clinical Trial Implementation Among Community Care Centers.

Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Sandra Megally, Elana Plotkin, Latha Shivakumar, Nicholas J Salgia, Zeynep B Zengin, Luis Meza, Neal Chawla, Daniella V Castro, Nazli Dizman and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inequities in enrollment across clinical trial phases and the need for a Spanish perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  18. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hedyeh EbrahimiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Sandra MegallyAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland.
Elana PlotkinAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland.
Latha ShivakumarAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland.
Nicholas J SalgiaRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Zeynep B ZenginDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Luis MezaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Neal ChawlaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Daniella V CastroCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Nazli DizmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ruma BhagatGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Seila LivGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Xiaochen LiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Adam RockCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Sandy LiuCity of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, California.
Abhishek TripathiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Tanya DorffCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Randall A OyerPenn Medicine Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Leigh BoehmerAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland.
Sumanta PalCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Alexander Chehrazi-RaffleCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
City of Hope · USAssociation of Community Cancer Centers · USYale University · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TUMOR IMMUNOLOGYT32CA085183 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Scott I. Abrams · 2001 to 2026
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA085183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While an overwhelming majority of patients diagnosed with cancer express willingness to participate in clinical trials, only a fraction will enroll onto a research protocol. Objective: To identify critical barriers to trial enrollment to translate findings into actionable practice changes that increase cancer clinical trial enrollment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included designated site contacts at oncology practices with teams who were highly involved with the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Community Oncology Research Institute (ACORI) clinical trials activities, all American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-ACCC collaboration pilot sites, and/or sites providing care to at least 25% African American and Hispanic residents. To determine participation trends among health care practices in oncology-focused research, identify barriers to clinical trial implementation and operation, and establish unmet needs for cancer clinics interested in trial participation, a 34-question survey was designed. Survey questions were defined within 3 categories: cancer center demographic characteristics, clinical trial characteristics, and referral practices. The survey was distributed through email and was open from June 20 through October 5, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participation in and barriers to conducting oncology trials in different community oncology settings. Results: The survey was distributed to 100 cancer centers, with completion by 58 centers (58%) across 25 states. Fifty-two centers (88%) reported that they conduct therapeutic clinical trials, of which 33 (63%) were from urban settings, 11 (21%) were from suburban settings, and 8 (15%) were from rural settings. Only 25% of rural practices (2 of 8) offered phase 1 trials, compared with 67% of urban practices (22 of 33) (P = .01). Respondents noted challenges in conducting research, including patient recruitment (27 respondents [52%]), limited staffing (27 [52%]), and nonrelevant trials for their patient population (25 [48%]). Among sites not offering therapeutic trials, barriers to research conduct included limited infrastructure, funding, and staffing. Most centers (46 of 58 [79%]) referred patients to outside centers for clinical trial enrollment, particularly in the context of late-stage disease and/or disease progression. Only 17 of these sites (37%) had established protocols for patient follow-up subsequent to outside referral. Conclusions and Relevance: In this national survey study of barriers to clinical trial implementation, most sites offered therapeutic trials, but there were significant disparities in trial availability across care settings. Furthermore, fundamental deficiencies in trial support infrastructure limited research activity, including within programs currently conducting research as well as at sites interested in future clinical research opportunities. These results identify crucial unmet needs for oncology clinics to effectively offer clinical trials to patients seeking care.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCancer Care FacilitiesCommunity Health CentersFemaleHumansNeoplasmsPatient SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38683608
PMCPMC11059033
OpenAlexW4396217642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.