Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683574›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2024

National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Trisha L Amboree, Jane R Montealegre, Susan L Parker, Ashvita Garg, Haluk Damgacioglu, Kathleen M Schmeler, Elizabeth Y Chiao, Elizabeth G Hill, Kalyani Sonawane, Ashish A Deshmukh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Trisha L AmboreeDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jane R MontealegreDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Susan L ParkerDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ashvita GargDepartment of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Haluk DamgaciogluDepartment of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Kathleen M SchmelerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Elizabeth Y ChiaoDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Elizabeth G HillDepartment of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Kalyani SonawaneDepartment of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Ashish A DeshmukhDepartment of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Prajakta AdsulDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Funding

Expanding a pragmatic randomized trial to assess mailed self-sample HPV testing to increase cervical cancer screening participation among Asian immigrant women in a safety net health systemR01MD013715 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MONTEALEGRE, JANE R · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) deliver health care to nearly 30 million underserved persons across the US, yet nationwide and state-level breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening use in FQHCs is not described. Furthermore, it is unknown how the underscreened FQHC population contributes to the total underscreened population at national and state levels. Objective: To describe national- and state-level breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening use among individuals served by FQHCs in the US and to estimate the percentage of underscreened individuals in the general population served by FQHCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of cancer screening used data from January 1 through December 31, 2020, from the FQHC Uniform Data System, reported by 1364 FQHCs across the US, and self-reported estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Participants were 16 696 692 US adults served by FQHCs who were eligible for breast (age, 50-74 years), cervical (age, 21-64 years), and colorectal (age, 50-75 years) cancer screening. Analyses were conducted between January 1 and June 30, 2023. Exposures: Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening-eligible individuals up to date on screening. Results: A total of 3 162 882 breast, 7 444 465 cervical, and 6 089 345 colorectal screening-eligible individuals were served by FQHCs in 2020. Nationally, screening use in FQHCs was 45.4% (95% CI, 45.4%-45.5%) for breast cancer, 51.0% (95% CI, 51.0%-51.1%) for cervical cancer, and 40.2% (95% CI, 40.1%-40.2%) for colorectal cancer. Screening use among the US general population was 78.2% (95% CI, 77.6%-78.9%) for breast cancer, 82.9% (95% CI, 82.3%-83.4%) for cervical cancer, and 72.3% (95% CI, 71.7%-72.8%) for colorectal cancer. The contribution of the underscreened population served by FQHCs to the national underscreened general population was 16.9% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 16.4%-17.4%) for breast cancer, 29.7% (95% UI, 28.8%-30.7%) for cervical cancer, and 14.7% (95% UI, 14.4%-15.0%) for colorectal cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this national cross-sectional study indicated major gaps in cancer screening use in FQHCs in the US. Improved prevention is urgently needed to address screening disparities.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38683574
PMCPMC11059050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.