ArticleMolecular diversity2024
A comparative analysis of computational drug repurposing approaches: proposing a novel tensor-matrix-tensor factorization method.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VCTatDot and VCTatMLP: novel deep learning models with triadic attention embeddings for synergistic drug combination prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient drug discovery relies on drug repurposing, an important and open research field. This work presents a novel factorization method and a practical comparison of different approaches for drug repurposing. First, we propose a novel tensor-matrix-tensor (TMT) formulation as a new data array method with a gradient-based factorization procedure. Additionally, this paper examines and contrasts four computational drug repurposing approaches-factorization-based methods, machine learning methods, deep learning methods, and graph neural networks-to fulfill the second purpose. We test the strategies on two datasets and assess each approach's performance, drawbacks, problems, and benefits based on results. The results demonstrate that deep learning techniques work better than other strategies and that their results might be more reliable. Ultimately, graph neural methods need to be in an inductive manner to have a reliable prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38683487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.