Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683340›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Engaging Students and Teachers as Community Scientists in DNA Barcoding Initiatives.

Latasha Wright, Jeanne Garbarino, Christine Marizzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Latasha WrightBioBus, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Jeanne GarbarinoRockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Christine MarizziBioBus, Inc., New York, NY, USA. christine@biobus.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, contributions to scientific knowledge have been perceived as something that only professional scientists have the ability to affect. This has led to the belief that scientific pursuits are done not by everyday people but by individuals who have no connection to the communities that their discoveries might impact. DNA barcoding initiatives have the potential to bridge this gap. Community leaders, students, teachers, and other community members can come together with engaged scientists to solve relevant issues that affect them. Over the last 20 years, DNA barcoding has been used successfully in a variety of educational contexts to incorporate original research into school curricula and informal outreach and education programs. DNA barcoding is especially suitable for educational settings because it is conceptually and technically straightforward, the workflow is adaptable to a variety of situations, and free and open-access online tools exist that allow participants to contribute high-quality data to international research efforts. DNA barcoding also offers a unique service-learning opportunity, where participants gain both knowledge and confidence in science. This is important because a growing body of evidence suggests that actively conducting research increases student and teacher engagement and retention of students in science. Here, we describe a framework and case studies in different educational settings that can be modeled and adapted to various educational contexts.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicStudentsCurriculumFacultyHumansCitizen scienceCommunity engagementCommunity scienceDNA barcodingEcologyEducationHigh schoolMiddle schoolParticipatory researchSocial justiceYouth voice

Identifiers

PMID38683340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.