Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683325›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Recent Advances in Closed-Tube Barcoding for FastFish-ID.

J Aquiles Sanchez, John E Rice, Lawrence J Wangh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Aquiles SanchezConsultant to Ecologenix, LLC, Auburndale, MA, USA.
John E RiceConsultant to Ecologenix, LLC, Auburndale, MA, USA.
Lawrence J WanghDepartment of Biology (Emeritus), Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA. LJWangh@Ecologenix.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FastFish-ID for rapid and accurate identification of fish species was conceived at Brandeis University based on pioneering work on Closed-Tube Barcoding (Rice et al., Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(2):1358-1363, 2016; Sirianni et al., Genome 59:1049-1061, 2016). FastFish-ID was subsequently validated and commercialized at Thermagenix, Inc. using a portable device and high-precision PCR (Naaum et al., Food Res Int 141:110035, 2021). The motivation for these efforts was the pressing need for a technology that could be widely used throughout the seafood supply chain to combat IUU Fishing (Helyar et al., PLOS ONE 9, 2014) and overfishing (FAO, State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9540EN/ , 2018), along with seafood fraud and mislabeling (Watson et al., Fish Fish 17:585-595, 2015). These destructive practices are wasting fish stocks, frustrating attempts to achieve seafood sustainability, endangering oceanic ecosystems, and causing consumers billions of dollars each year (Porterfield et al., Oceana: February, 2022). During the past three Covid19 pandemic years, EcologeniX, LLC has taken over further development and optimization of FastFish-ID. The present chapter provides an overview of the improvements introduced throughout the FastFish-ID process.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFishesAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialFisheriesPolymerase Chain ReactionSeafoodDNA, MitochondrialClosed-Tube BarcodingFastFish-IDFluorescent SignatureInterdiction of IUU FishingIntraspecies VariantsPortable Barcoding PlatformSeafood FraudSpecies IdentificationSynthetic Reference Target DNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.