Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683260›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2024

Eligibility of a novel BW + technology and comparison of sensitivity and specificity of different imaging methods for radiological caries detection.

Kathrin Becker, Henrike Ehrlich, Mira Hüfner, Nicole Rauch, Caroline Busch, Beryl Schwarz-Herzke, Dieter Drescher, Jürgen Becker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathrin BeckerDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany. kathrin.becker@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-4683
Henrike EhrlichDepartment of Orthodontics, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mira HüfnerDepartment of Orthodontics, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nicole RauchDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Caroline BuschDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Beryl Schwarz-HerzkeInstitute for Anatomy II, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dieter DrescherDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen BeckerDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBitewing radiography is considered to be of high diagnostic value in caries detection, but owing to projections, lesions may remain undetected. The novel bitewing plus (BW +) technology enables scrolling through radiographs in different directions and angles. The present study aimed at comparing BW + with other 2D and 3D imaging methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and user reliability. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive human cadavers were used in this study. In three cadavers, natural teeth were transplanted post-mortem. BW + , two-dimensional (digital sensors, imaging plates, 2D and 3D bitewing radiographs) and 3D methods (high and low dose CBCT) were taken. Carious lesions were evaluated on 96 teeth at three positions (mesial, distal, and occlusal) and scored according to their level of demineralization by ten observers, resulting in 35,799 possible lesions across all observers and settings. For reference, µCT scans of all teeth were performed.

resultsOverall, radiographic evaluations showed a high rate of false-negative diagnoses, with around 70% of lesions remaining undetected, especially enamel lesions. BW + showed the highest sensitivity for dentinal caries and had comparatively high specificity overall.

conclusionsWithin the limits of the study, BW + showed great potential for added diagnostic value, especially for dentinal caries. However, the tradeoff of diagnostic benefit and radiation exposure must be considered according to each patient's age and risk.

Indexed as

CadaverDental CariesRadiography, BitewingSensitivity and SpecificityCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of Results3D-RadiologyCone Beam CTDental cariesDental radiographyDigital imagingEffective dose

Identifiers

PMID38683260
PMCPMC11180636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.