Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683234›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Antimicrobial action, cytotoxicity and erosive potential of hypochlorous acid obtained from an electrolytic device compared with sodium hypochlorite.

Matheus Albino Souza, Liviu Steier, Gabriele Nichetti Vanin, Mylena Lazareti Zanella, Camila Monteiro Pizzi, Eduarda Rizzon Ferreira, Felipe Gomes Dallepiane, Nathan Mateus Piccolo, Jordana da Silva Koch, Kellyn Rocca Souza and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Matheus Albino SouzaSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Liviu SteierSchool of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania - UPENN, 240 South 40Th Street (40Th & Locust St.), Philadelphia, PA, ZIP19104, USA.
Gabriele Nichetti VaninSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Mylena Lazareti ZanellaSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Camila Monteiro PizziSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Eduarda Rizzon FerreiraSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Felipe Gomes DallepianeSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Nathan Mateus PiccoloSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo - UPF. BR 285/São José, Prédio A7, Apto 2, Passo Fundo, RS, CEP: 9052-900, Brazil.
Jordana da Silva KochGraduate Program in Dentistry, Oral Biology Lab, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Rua Sarmento Leite 500 Sala 134, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP90050-170, Brazil.
Kellyn Rocca SouzaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Oral Biology Lab, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Rua Sarmento Leite 500 Sala 134, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP90050-170, Brazil.
Ubirajara Maciel da CostaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Santa Catarina - UDESC, Av. Luiz de Camões, 2090, Conta Dinheiro, Lages, SC, CEP: 88.520-000, Brazil.
Vanessa Valgas Dos SantosSchool of Medicine, University of Planalto Catarinense - UNIPLAC, Av. Mal. Castelo Branco 170, Lages, SC, CEP 88526-075, Brazil.
Aleksandra Palatynska-UlatowskaDepartment of Endodontics, Medical Faculty, Division of Dentistry, Medical University of Lödz, 251 Pomorska Street, Lödz, 92-213, Poland.
José Antônio Poli de FigueiredoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Oral Biology Lab, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Rua Sarmento Leite 500 Sala 134, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP90050-170, Brazil. poli.figueiredo@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare the antimicrobial action, cytotoxicity, cleaning ability, and erosion of dentine of hypochlorous acid (HClO) obtained from an electrolytic device at two different concentrations (Dentaqua) and three concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).

methodsMicrobiological test-The root canals of sixty single-rooted extracted human teeth were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into 6 groups (n = 10), according to decontamination protocol: DW (control); 1% NaOCl; 2.5% NaOCl; 5.25% NaOCl; 250 ppm HClO and 500 ppm HClO. The colony-forming units were counted to evaluate the decontamination potential of each group, calculating the reduction in bacterial percentage. Cytotoxicity test-Cytotoxicity was evaluated after inoculation of the same tested protocols in fibroblastic cells for 3 min, calculating the cell viability percentages. Specifical statistical analysis was performed (α = 5%). Cleaning ability and erosion-Fifty-six single-rooted bovine lower incisors were divided into seven groups of 8 roots each, being the test groups 1% NaOCl; 2.5% NaOCl; 5,25% NaOCl; 250 ppm HClO and 500 ppm HClO, and a negative and positive control. Negative control was not contaminated, and the other groups were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. SEM images were ranked as from the cleanest to the least clean. Erosion was also assessed, being ranked from the least to the most eroded dentine.

resultsThe highest bacterial reduction was observed in experimental groups, with no statistical differences between them (p > 0.05). The highest number of viable cells was observed in control group, followed by 250 ppm HClO and 500 ppm HClO groups, with statistical differences between them (p < 0.05). 1% NaOCl; 2.5% NaOCl; 5.25% NaOCl and 500 ppm HClO displayed the cleanest areas. All sodium hypochlorite groups displayed erosion with higher ranks with greater concentration, while hypochlorous acid did not display any erosion regardless the concentration.

conclusionsIt is possible to conclude that HClO obtained from an electrolytic device presented high antimicrobial activity and low cytotoxicity in both tested concentrations. 500 ppm HClO did not display erosion and showed great cleaning ability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 500 ppm hypochlorous acid may reduce unfavorable behavior of sodium hypochlorite whilst maintaining its antimicrobial action.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityEnterococcus faecalisHypochlorous AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCattleCell SurvivalDentinElectrolysisHumansIn Vitro TechniquesAnti-Infective AgentsHypochlorous AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteAntimicrobial activityCytotoxicityElectrolytic deviceHypochlorous acidSodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.