Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38683232›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2024

Therapeutic potential of third-generation chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen for treating multiple myeloma.

Punchita Rujirachaivej, Teerapong Siriboonpiputtana, Piriya Luangwattananun, Pornpimon Yuti, Yupanun Wutti-In, Kornkan Choomee, Jatuporn Sujjitjoon, Takol Chareonsirisuthigul, Budsaba Rerkamnuaychoke, Mutita Junking and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Punchita Rujirachaivej *Graduate Program in Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerapong Siriboonpiputtana *Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piriya LuangwattananunSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Pornpimon YutiSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Yupanun Wutti-InDivision of Transfusion Science, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kornkan ChoomeeSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Jatuporn SujjitjoonSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Takol ChareonsirisuthigulDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Budsaba RerkamnuaychokeDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mutita JunkingSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. mutita.jun@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8347-3000
Pa-Thai YenchitsomanusSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT) and Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. ptyench@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-5927
Siriraj Hospital · THMahidol University · THChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

Mahidol University's Basic Research Fund (Fiscal Year 2022) BRF1-029/2565The National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) N35E660102The Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council (NXPO) through the Program Management Unit-Competitiveness (PMU-C) C10F630063the Siriraj Research Fund of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University R016034008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy characterized by the rapid proliferation of malignant plasma cells within the bone marrow. Standard therapies often fail due to patient resistance. The US FDA has approved second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells) for MM treatment. However, achieving enduring clinical responses remains a challenge in CAR T cell therapy. This study developed third-generation T cells with an anti-BCMA CAR (anti-BCMA-CAR3). The CAR incorporated a fully human scFv specific to BCMA, linked to the CD8 hinge region. The design included the CD28 transmembrane domain, two co-stimulatory domains (CD28 and 4-1BB), and the CD3ζ signaling domain (28BBζ). Lentiviral technology generated these modified T cells, which were compared against anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells for efficacy against cancer. Anti-BCMA-CAR3 T cells exhibited significantly higher cytotoxic activity against BCMA-expressing cells (KMS-12-PE and NCI-H929) compared to anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells. At an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1, anti-BCMA-CAR3 T cells induced lysis in 75.5 ± 3.8% of NCI-H929 cells, whereas anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells achieved 56.7 ± 3.4% (p = 0.0023). Notably, after twelve days of cultivation, anti-BCMA-CAR3 T cells nearly eradicated BCMA-positive cells (4.1 ± 2.1%), while anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells allowed 36.8 ± 20.1% to survive. This study highlights the superior efficacy of anti-BCMA-CAR3 T cells against both low and high BCMA-expressing MM cells, surpassing anti-BCMA-CAR2 T cells. These findings suggest potential for advancing anti-BCMA-CAR3 T cells in chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy for relapsed/refractory MM.

Indexed as

B-Cell Maturation AntigenImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansSingle-Chain AntibodiesB-Cell Maturation AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSingle-Chain AntibodiesTNFRSF17 protein, humanAnti-BCMA-CAR T cellsB-cell maturation antigenCancer immunotherapyChimeric antigen receptorMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID38683232
PMCPMC11058938
OpenAlexW4396221693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.