ReviewJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2024
Current Diagnostic Approaches in the Genetic Diagnosis of Disorders of Sex Development
Review in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing 46,XY Differences of Sex Development: Novel Genetic Variants and Diagnostic Pitfalls in a Single-Center Cohort.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Approach to Disorders of Sex Development in the Genomic Era.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Deciphering the gonadal cell atlas of Monopterus albus and cell fate during sex reversal based on single-cell RNA sequencing.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of sex development (DSD) are a clinically and genetically highly heterogeneous group of congenital disorders. The most accurate and rapid diagnosis may be possible with a complementary multidisciplinary diagnostic approach, including comprehensive clinical, hormonal, and genetic investigations. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of DSD requires urgency in terms of gender selection and management of the case. Despite the genetic tests performed in current daily practice, the genetic cause is still not elucidated in a significant proportion of cases. Karyotype analysis can be used as a standard for sex chromosome identification. In addition, quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction or fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis can be used for faster and more cost-effective detection of the sex chromosome and SRY gene. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, single-gene sequence analysis, next-generation sequence analysis (NGSA), targeted NGSA, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing analyses can be performed according to preliminary diagnoses. Microarray analysis, including array comparative genomic hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphism array, should be performed in cases with syndromic findings and if no pathology is detected with other tests. In DSD cases, the use of optical genome mapping and techniques, which will probably be in daily practice in the near future, may be considered. In conclusion, the clinical and genetic diagnosis of DSD is difficult, and molecular genetic diagnosis is often not available. This has psychosocial and health implications for patients and their families. New genetic techniques, especially those targeting the whole genome, may provide a better understanding of DSD through the identification of little-known genetic causes. This review focuses on conventional genetic and next-generation genetic techniques used in the genetic diagnosis of DSD, as well as possible genetic diagnostic techniques and approaches that may be used in routine practice in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.