Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38682818›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2024

Prediction of cell cycle distribution after drug exposure by high content imaging analysis using low-toxic DNA staining dye.

Kazuma Takeuchi, Yumiko Nishimura, Takayoshi Matsubara, Sho Isoyama, Asuka Suzuki, Masaaki Matsuura, Shingo Dan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kazuma TakeuchiDivision of Molecular Pharmacology, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7185-1257
Yumiko NishimuraDivision of Molecular Pharmacology, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9138-8463
Takayoshi MatsubaraDivision of Molecular Pharmacology, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6804-0804
Sho IsoyamaDivision of Molecular Pharmacology, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-1233
Asuka SuzukiGraduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-696X
Masaaki MatsuuraGraduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-2423
Shingo DanDivision of Molecular Pharmacology, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2725

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP 19H03525Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP 22H04922Nippon Foundation 2022003175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interference in cell cycle progression has been noted as one of the important properties of anticancer drugs. In this study, we developed the cell cycle prediction model using high-content imaging data of recipient cells after drug exposure and DNA-staining with a low-toxic DNA dye, SiR-DNA. For this purpose, we exploited HeLa and MCF7 cells introduced with a fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci). Fucci-expressing cancer cells were subjected to high-content imaging analysis using OperettaCLS after 36-h exposure to anticancer drugs; the nuclei were segmented, and the morphological and intensity properties of each nucleus characterized by SiR-DNA staining were calculated using imaging analysis software, Harmony. For the use of training, we classified cells into each phase of the cell cycle using the Fucci system. Training data (n = 7500) and validation data (n = 2500) were randomly sampled and the binary classification prediction models for G1, early S, and S/G2/M phases of the cell cycle were developed using four supervised machine learning algorithms. We selected random forest as the model with the best performance through 10-fold cross-validation; the accuracy rate was approximately 75%-87%. Regarding feature importance, variables expected to be biologically related to the cell cycle, for example, signal intensity and nuclear size, were highly ranked, suggesting the validity of the model. These results showed that the cell cycle can be predicted in cancer cells by simply exploiting the current prediction model using fluorescent images of DNA-staining dye, and the model could be applied for the use of future ex vivo drug sensitivity diagnosis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell CycleFluorescent DyesCell NucleusDNAHeLa CellsHumansMachine LearningMCF-7 CellsStaining and LabelingAntineoplastic AgentsDNAFluorescent Dyescell cyclecell linehigh‐content imaging analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38682818
PMCPMC11057241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.