Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38682285›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of nutrition2024

A systematic review of the effect of dietary and nutritional interventions on the behaviours and mental health of prisoners.

Matthew Poulter, Shelly Coe, Catherine Anna-Marie Graham, Bethan Leach, Jonathan Tammam

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07558187 (Assessment of Lifestyle Parameters and Biomarkers of Biochemistry and Physiology to Address Health Inequalities), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07558187 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Lifestyle Parameters and Biomarkers of Biochemistry and Physiology to Address Health Inequalities: An Exploratory Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ThessalyRan2026 to 2028Enrolled2,000ConditionsNon-communicable Diseases (NCD), Addiction to Opioids, Incarceration, Opioid-use Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew PoulterCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2188-6168
Shelly CoeCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0508-7507
Catherine Anna-Marie GrahamCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, Oxford, UK.
Bethan LeachPractice Plus Group, Hawker House 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Rd, Reading, BerkshireRG1 8BW, UK.
Jonathan TammamCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prisoners experience a higher burden of poor health, aggressive behaviours and worsening mental health than the general population. This systematic review aimed to identify research that used nutrition-based interventions in prisons, focusing on outcomes of mental health and behaviours. The systematic review was registered with Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 26 January 2022: CRD42022293370. Inclusion criteria comprised of current prisoners with no limit on time, location, age, sex or ethnicity. Only quantitative research in the English language was included. PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched, retrieving 933 results, with 11 included for qualitative synthesis. Studies were checked for quality using the revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomised trials or risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool. Of the included studies, seven used nutritional supplements, three included diet changes, and one used education. Of the seven supplement-based studies, six included rule violations as an outcome, and only three demonstrated significant improvements. One study included mental health as an outcome; however, results did not reach significance. Of the three diet change studies, two investigated cognitive function as an outcome, with both reaching significance. Anxiety was included in one diet change study, which found a significant improvement through consuming oily fish. One study using diet education did not find a significant improvement in overall mental resilience. Overall, results are mixed, with the included studies presenting several limitations and heterogeneity. Future research should aim to consider increased homogeneity in research design, allowing for a higher quality of evidence to assess the role nutrition can play in improving the health of prisoners.

Indexed as

DietMental HealthPrisonersAdultDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleDeficienciesMental healthNutritionNutrition interventionsPrisoners

Identifiers

PMID38682285
PMCPMC11420884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.