Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681894›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Dosimetric Comparison of CPAP and DIBH for Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy.

Min Seo Choi, Ryeong Hwang Park, Joongyo Lee, Yeona Cho, Jee Suk Chang, Jihun Kim, Jin Sung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Min Seo ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ryeong Hwang ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joongyo LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeona ChoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jee Suk ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jihun KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Sung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the increasing interest in using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in radiation therapy (RT), direct comparisons with the more widely used deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) have been limited. This planning study aimed to offer comprehensive geometric and dosimetric evidence by comparing CPAP and DIBH-based RT plans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective data set of 35 patients with left-sided breast cancer with planning computed tomography scans under three breathing conditions (free breathing (FB), CPAP with 10 cmH Results: CPAP and DIBH plans demonstrated comparable mean heart doses (1.05 Gy), which were significantly lower than the FB plan (1.34 Gy). The maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery was smallest in the CPAP plan (4.44 Gy), followed by DIBH (4.73 Gy) and FB (7.33 Gy) plans. Other organ-at-risk doses for CPAP and DIBH were similar, with mean contralateral breast doses of 2.27 and 2.21 Gy, mean ipsilateral lung doses of 4.09 and 4.08 Gy, V20 at 6.11% and 6.31%, and mean contralateral lung doses of 0.94 and 0.92 Gy, respectively. No significant difference was found in the minimum heart-to-CTV distance between CPAP and DIBH. DIBH exhibited the greatest lung volume (3908 cc), followed by CPAP (3509 cc), and FB(2703 cc). Conclusions: The comparison between CPAP and DIBH shows their similarity in both geometric and dosimetric aspects, providing strong evidence for CPAP's effectiveness and feasibility in RT. This suggests its potential as an alternative to DIBH for patients with left-sided breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID38681894
PMCPMC11043855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.