Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681813›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2024

A Professional Development Workshop: Applying the Race and Culture Guide to Reduce Bias in Medical Teaching Cases.

Ryan Vagedes, Berkeley Franz, Anna Kerr, Frances Wymbs, Chynna Smith, Alicia Rodgers, Samantha Nandyal, David Strawhun, Katy Kropf, Sharon Casapulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryan VagedesDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Berkeley FranzDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Anna KerrDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Frances WymbsDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Chynna SmithDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Alicia RodgersDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Samantha NandyalDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
David StrawhunDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Katy KropfDepartment of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.
Sharon CasapullaOffice of Rural and Underserved Programs, and Department of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical teaching cases are a cornerstone of health professions education programs, but cases historically have lacked diversity and have the potential to reinforce essentialism. In this article, we describe the creation, implementation, and feasibility assessment of a professional development workshop aimed at integrating an existing bias reduction tool into discussion and revision of teaching cases. Methods: Six 60-minute workshops were held introducing "The Race and Culture Guide for Editors of Teaching Cases" to different health profession education programs wherein all participants worked in small groups to critique and edit two sample teaching cases. To assess initial feasibility, facilitators completed a facilitator evaluation survey to capture experiences after the first three workshops. Due to positive feedback, workshops were continued, and participants completed a participant evaluation survey to understand learner impact. Results: Facilitators (n=6) identified the workshop as addressing an important need, highlighted the value in small-group format, and noted their ability to facilitate future sessions. Participants (n=18) rated the workshop as useful, effective at challenging biases, and would recommend the workshop to others. Conclusion: The purpose of this study was to understand the feasibility of implementing a discussion-based workshop integrating a bias reduction tool. Initial feasibility and acceptability assessments demonstrate that this workshop.

Identifiers

PMID38681813
PMCPMC11051698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.