Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681789›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2024

Diagnostic accuracy of ePOS score in predicting DNR labeling after ICU admission: A prospective observational study (ePOS-DNR).

Omar E Ramadan, Ahmed F Mady, Mohammed A Al-Odat, Ahmed N Balshi, Ahmed W Aletreby, Taisy J Stephen, Sheena R Diolaso, Jennifer Q Gano, Waleed Th Aletreby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Omar E RamadanDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed F MadyDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A Al-OdatDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed N BalshiDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed W AletrebyFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Taisy J StephenDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sheena R DiolasoDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jennifer Q GanoDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed Th AletrebyDepartment of Critical Care, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resuscitation can sometimes be futile and making a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision is in the best interest of the patient. The electronic poor outcome screening (ePOS) score was developed to predict 6-month poor outcomes of critically ill patients. We explored the diagnostic accuracy of the ePOS score in predicting DNR decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This study was conducted at the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital in Saudi Arabia between March and May 2023. Prospectively, we calculated ePOS scores for all eligible consecutive admissions after 48 h in the ICU and recorded the DNR orders. The ability of the score to predict DNR was explored using logistic regression. Youden's ideal cut-off value was calculated using the DeLong method, and different diagnostic accuracy measures were generated with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We enrolled 857 patients, 125 received a DNR order and 732 did not. The average ePOS score of DNR and non-DNR patients was 28.2±10.7 and 15.2±9.7, respectively. ePOS score, as a predictor of DNR order, had an area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve of 81.8 % (95% CI: 79.0 to 84.3, Conclusions: In this study, the ePOS score performed well as a diagnostic test for patients who will be labeled as DNR during their ICU stay. A cut-off score >17 may help guide clinical decisions to withhold or commence resuscitative measures.

Indexed as

Diagnostic accuracyDo-not-resuscitate (DNR)Intensive care unit (ICU)ResuscitationSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID38681789
PMCPMC11043627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.