Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681754›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2024

Prompt Tuning in Biomedical Relation Extraction.

Jianping He, Fang Li, Jianfu Li, Xinyue Hu, Yi Nian, Yang Xiang, Jingqi Wang, Qiang Wei, Yiming Li, Hua Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Relation extraction using large language models: a case study on acupuncture point locations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jianping HeMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Fang LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Jianfu LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Xinyue HuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Yi NianMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Yang XiangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Jingqi WangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Qiang WeiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Yiming LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.
Hua XuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA.
Cui TaoMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical relation extraction (RE) is critical in constructing high-quality knowledge graphs and databases as well as supporting many downstream text mining applications. This paper explores prompt tuning on biomedical RE and its few-shot scenarios, aiming to propose a simple yet effective model for this specific task. Prompt tuning reformulates natural language processing (NLP) downstream tasks into masked language problems by embedding specific text prompts into the original input, facilitating the adaption of pre-trained language models (PLMs) to better address these tasks. This study presents a customized prompt tuning model designed explicitly for biomedical RE, including its applicability in few-shot learning contexts. The model's performance was rigorously assessed using the chemical-protein relation (CHEMPROT) dataset from BioCreative VI and the drug-drug interaction (DDI) dataset from SemEval-2013, showcasing its superior performance over conventional fine-tuned PLMs across both datasets, encompassing few-shot scenarios. This observation underscores the effectiveness of prompt tuning in enhancing the capabilities of conventional PLMs, though the extent of enhancement may vary by specific model. Additionally, the model demonstrated a harmonious balance between simplicity and efficiency, matching state-of-the-art performance without needing external knowledge or extra computational resources. The pivotal contribution of our study is the development of a suitably designed prompt tuning model, highlighting prompt tuning's effectiveness in biomedical RE. It offers a robust, efficient approach to the field's challenges and represents a significant advancement in extracting complex relations from biomedical texts. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-024-00162-9.

Indexed as

Biomedical relation extractionFew-shot learningPre-trained language modelsPrompt tuning

Identifiers

PMID38681754
PMCPMC11052745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.