Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681740›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024

Evaluation of alternative methods of tunnel composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) II.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Lieve Herman, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist, Maarten Nauta and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Konstantinos Koutsoumanis
Ana Allende
Declan Bolton
Sara Bover-Cid
Marianne Chemaly
Lieve Herman
Friederike Hilbert
Roland Lindqvist
Maarten Nauta
Romolo Nonno
Luisa Peixe
Panagiotis Skandamis
Giuseppe Ru
Marion Simmons
Alessandra De Cesare
Pablo Fernandez Escamez
Elisabetta Suffredini
Angel Ortiz-Pelaez
Avelino Alvarez Ordonez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two alternative methods for producing compost in a tunnel, from certain category (Cat.) 3 animal by-products (ABP) and other non-ABP material, were assessed. The first method proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h and the second 60°C for 48 h, both with a maximum particle size of 200 mm. The assessment of the Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) exclusively focused on Cat. 3 ABP materials (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin no longer intended for human consumption). The proposed composting processes were evaluated for their efficacy to achieve a reduction of at least 5 log

Indexed as

ABPalternative methodcategory 3composttunnel

Identifiers

PMID38681740
PMCPMC11046411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.