ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Different Keratotopographic Patterns of Keratoconus.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating corneal topographic patterns in keratoconic eyes and their association with keratoconus changes over time.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of biomechanical indices measured by ocular response analyzer between children and elderly: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the frequency of main keratotopographic patterns at the 1 Methods: The study comprised two stages. The first stage was computational-experimental, where we utilized COMSOL Multiphysics® software (COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden) to mathematically model corneal mechanical behavior under intraocular pressure and pulsed air jet action in both normal and keratoconic conditions. The second stage was the clinical phase, during which we retrospectively analyzed the examination results of both healthy subjects and patients with keratoconus. In total, the study included 256 eyes (256 subjects). Among them, 174 eyes (174 healthy individuals) had normal corneas with different refractions, and 82 eyes (82 individuals) had stages 1, 2, and 3 of keratoconus based on Amsler-Krumeich classification. The keratotopographic characteristics of the participants were assessed using Sirius (Schwind, Germany) and Pentacam AXL (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH, Germany) keratotomographs, while the corneal biomechanical properties were studied using noncontact tonometry with the Corvis ST device (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH, Germany). The study focused on evaluating corneal stiffness index values in the central optical zone under various keratotopographic patterns. In addition, it compared the elastic coefficient values Results: The mean age of the patients in the study was 30.16 ± 8.31 years, with 166 men and 90 women participating. The study revealed typical keratotopographic patterns in the examined keratoconus stages, as well as their occurrence frequency. In the 1 Conclusions: The decrease in strength properties in keratoconus occurs in a local area, the size and degree of which are determined by the disease stage. The indicated biomechanical parameters are consistent regardless of the shape and localization of keratotopographic patterns but are relevant to diagnostic specifications using the Corvis ST pneumotonometer, which assesses corneal properties in the apical zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.