Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681691›Full record

ReviewJournal of current ophthalmology

Eyedrop Instillation Techniques, Difficulties, and Currently Available Solutions: A Literature Review.

Rohan Dadak, Amin Hatamnejad, Nikhil S Patil, Hongbo Qiu, Toby Y B Chan, Jaspreet Rayat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rohan DadakMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Amin HatamnejadMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nikhil S PatilMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hongbo QiuMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Toby Y B ChanDivision of Ophthalmology, McMaster University, Waterloo Regional Campus, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
Jaspreet RayatDivision of Ophthalmology, McMaster University, Waterloo Regional Campus, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To review current eyedrop instillation techniques, common difficulties faced by patients instilling eyedrops, available eyedrop assistive devices, and patient education regarding eyedrop instillation. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from conception until June 2022 for articles on eyedrop instillation difficulties, techniques, tools, and patient education. Results: Instillation involves pulling down the lower eyelids and placing drops on the corneal surface or conjunctival fornix, followed by closing of the eyelids for about 1 min. Examples of techniques include eyelid closure and nasolacrimal obstruction techniques. Patients encounter many difficulties when administering eyedrops, including but not limited to poor visibility, squeezing the dropper bottle, aiming the bottle, and accidentally blinking. However, devices are available that assist with aim and dropper compression-force reduction in eyedrop instillation. These can be particularly useful in patient demographics with diminished manual dexterity or the ability to generate force from their fingers. Furthermore, despite patient education in eyedrop instillation not being a common practice, it has been found that adequate patient education can lead to significant improvement in eyedrop instillation technique. Conclusions: While many factors are associated with poor eyedrop instillation technique, there are many solutions available including assistive devices and proper instillation education.

Indexed as

Eyedrop administrationEyedrop difficultiesEyedrop instillationEyedrop technique

Identifiers

PMID38681691
PMCPMC11047814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.