ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Digital Survey Assessment of Individual and Occupational Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders among Indian Ophthalmologists.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) and the associated occupational risk factors among Indian ophthalmologists, including residents and fellows. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among ophthalmologists in India using a semi-structured questionnaire in a web-based survey. The questionnaire was prepared in English after extensive literature research and consulting with subject experts. It was pretested on ten ophthalmologists and after confirming that there were no ambiguities, the questionnaire was circulated. After providing informed consent online and ensuring the confidentiality of information, respondents could fill out the questionnaire containing questions to assess demographic details, risk factors, and musculoskeletal symptoms. Results: We received 551 valid responses, out of which 74.77% reported musculoskeletal symptoms since starting practice in ophthalmology. We found a statistically significant association of work-related MSD with greater hours of practice, a higher number of hours of surgery, and a larger patient load. The self-reported symptoms were maximum in lower back (56.55%), followed by neck (49.03%), upper back (38.59%), and shoulder (23.79%). As a remedial measure, 58.98% resorted to rest while only 8.98% consulted orthopedist. Only 46% were aware of good ergonomic practices. Surgery (74.5%), indirect ophthalmoscopy (51.69%), and slit-lamp examination (50.73%) were reported as the major culprits. Respondents declared an interference with personal life (39.56%), with work (33.74%) as well as having caused psychological stress (43.2%) due to work-related MSD. Conclusion: A vast majority of our respondents reported work-related MSD. Major risk factors were hours of practice, hours of surgery, higher body mass index, sedentary lifestyle, and higher patient load. The awareness of ergonomic practices was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.