ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Electrophysiological and Visual Parameter Changes in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients undergoing Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy: A Randomized Control Trial.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in suprachoroidal space and subtenon space in cases of retinitis pigmentosa, which is a genetic disease, leading to gradual loss of vision. Till date, no treatment is available. Methods: Seventy-eight eyes of 39 patients of retinitis pigmentosa having visual acuity ranging from reading of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart from 1 m onward to patients who were not able to read the ETDRS chart but whose visual acuity ranged from finger count close to face to <1 m were included in the study. The left and right eyes of each patient were randomized as the intervention eye and control eye. 0.2 mL of autologous PRP was injected in suprachoroidal space and 0.5 mL of PRP was injected in subtenon space of the intervention eye taking aseptic precautions. Injections were repeated at 15-day intervals up to 3 injections. Results: Majority of patients were in the age group of 18-30 years (20 cases) followed by 31-45 years (13 cases) and more than 45 years (6 cases). Intervention eyes showed a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Improvement was noted in amplitude density latency and in ring ratio of mfERG. There was a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). However, no improvement in mfERG or BCVA was observed in the control group. Conclusions: Gene therapy may be the ultimate cure for retinitis pigmentosa, but it is unaffordable for many patients due to its high cost. PRP may be recognized as a modality to improve vision and stop further deterioration, especially in cases where functional vision is preserved. Negligible treatment costs and affordability will give power to economically disadvantaged patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.