ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing 27-Gauge Vitrectomy to 23-Gauge Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Full-Thickness Macular Holes.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-vitrectomy hypotony: mechanisms, risk factors and management strategies.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Hypotony-Free Closure of Infusion Sclerotomy Using a Slit-Modified Trocar in 23-Gauge Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of 27-gauge vitrectomy and 23-gauge vitrectomy. Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized study. Fifty-three patients affected by vitreoretinal interface disorders (epiretinal membranes and macular holes) were randomly scheduled to undergo 27-gauge (28 patients) or 23-gauge (25 patients) pars plana vitrectomy. The presence of any potential factor of increased baseline inflammation or eye anatomy influencing the surgery was criteria for exclusion. The time of surgery, postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), state of sclerotomy wounds, rate of complications, postoperative pain, and indicators of inflammation were studied. We also introduced a new parameter to compare intraocular inflammation after surgery, given by the change in the number of intraretinal hyperreflective foci (HRF). Results: The 27-gauge vitrectomy was 1.28 min longer than 23-gauge vitrectomy ( Conclusions: The 27-gauge vitrectomy may have better outcomes in terms of IOP maintenance and cause less redness after the surgery but with a slightly prolonged surgery time and no other differences under other parameters (inflammation, rate of complications, postoperative pain, visual gain, and closure of the sclerotomy wounds).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.