ArticleHeliyon2024
Longitudinal improvements in clinical and functional outcomes following initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ivacaftor for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Progress of personalized medicine of cystic fibrosis in the times of efficient CFTR modulators.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) has resulted in unprecedented clinical improvements necessitating development of outcome measures for monitoring disease course. Intranasal micro-optical coherence tomography (μOCT) has previously helped detect and characterize mucociliary abnormalities in patients with CF. This study was done to determine if μOCT can define the effects of ETI on nasal mucociliary clearance and monitor changes conferred to understand mechanistic effects of CFTR modulators beyond CFTR activation. Methods: 26 subjects, with at least 1 F508del mutation were recruited and followed at baseline (visit 1), +1 month (visit 2) and +6 months (visit 4) following initiation of ETI therapy. Clinical outcomes were computed at visits 1, 2 and 4. Intranasal μOCT imaging and functional metrics analysis including mucociliary transport rate (MCT) estimation were done at visits 1 and 2. Results: Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV Conclusions: Treatment with ETI resulted in significant and sustained clinical improvements over 6 months. Functional improvements in MCT rate were evident within a month after initiation of ETI therapy indicating that μOCT imaging is sensitive to the treatment effect of HEMT and suggests improved mucociliary transport as a probable mechanism of action underlying the clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.