ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of efficacy and safety between daptomycin plus β-lactam and daptomycin monotherapy for bloodstream infections due to gram-positive cocci: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety evaluation of remdesivir administration in patients with severe renal impairment and coronavirus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical or microbiological outcomes and safety of a combination of daptomycin (DAP) and β-lactams compared to DAP monotherapy in patients with blood stream infection (BSI) due to gram-positive cocci (GPC). Methods: We searched Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Ityuushi databases up to January 30, 2023. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical failure, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation. Results: Six cohorts or case-control studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams significantly reduced the mortality and clinical failure rate for all BSI due to GPC compared with the DAP monotherapy (mortality, odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.98; clinical failure, OR = 0.42, 95 % CI = 0.22-0.81). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of CPK elevation between the two groups (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.39-1.84). Conclusion: Altogether, combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams can improve the prognosis for patients with BSI due to GPC compared with DAP alone. Therefore, it should be considered as an option for the empirical treatment of BSI caused by GPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.