ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of a centrifugal disc fertilizer spreading system for UAVs in rice fields.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized design and experiment of a controllable rotary tube strip fertilizer spreader for hilly mountainous terrain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unmanned aerial vehicle payload technology applications in agriculture and other low-altitude scenarios: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Determination of the effective swath of a plant protection UAV adapted to mist nozzles in mountain Nangguo pear orchards.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Optimization of and experimentation with a bifurcated swing tube strip fertilizer spreading device based on MBD-DEM coupling.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) granular fertilizer spreading technology has been gradually applied in agricultural production. However, in the process of spreading operation, the actual influence effect of each factor in field operation is still unclear. Based on the self-developed UAV fertilizer spreading system, this paper explores the effects of three factors, the baffle retraction (B), spreading disc speed (D), and UAV flight altitude (H), on the granular fertilizer spreading effect in the actual field scenarios through the orthogonal test and taking the coefficient of variation (Cv) and relative error of fertilizer application rate (λ) as the evaluation indexes. The results showed that the optimal factor level combination of Cv was 11.23 % for BbDbHa (the baffle retraction is 6 %, spreading disc speed is 600r/min, and UAV flight height is 1.5 m) at UAV flight speed of 2 m/s. The best factor level combination for λ was BbDbHb of 7.99 % (the baffle retraction is 6 %, spreading disc speed is 600r/min, and UAV flight height is 2 m). In addition, by analysing the influence of the weather and the vortex of the rice canopy on the actual spreading effect, it was found that the weather has less influence on the spreading effect of this system, while the vortex caused by the airflow of the UAV rotor has a certain influence on the spreading effect, which is also relatively easy to ignore in fertilizer spreading operations. The results of the study can be used to explore the operational effects of actual fertilizer application by UAVs in rice field, which will help promote the development of UAV spreading technology and provide a reference for precision fertilizer application through agricultural aviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.