ArticleCureus2024
Knowledge and Preparedness of Physicians in Relation to Anaphylaxis at Primary Healthcare Centers in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the combined PBL-CBL teaching method of anaphylactic shock prevention and care in the fundamental nursing course.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Anaphylaxis is a significant, often fatal, systemic allergic reaction with a rapid start that may affect the respiratory and/or circulatory systems; for patients to survive, emergency management must be done properly. When anaphylaxis is confirmed or highly suspected, epinephrine should be injected intramuscularly. This study aimed to assess the preparedness of primary healthcare physicians for anaphylaxis in terms of recognition and management of this condition in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out among primary healthcare physicians in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among the targeted physicians. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic characteristics, general awareness and management of anaphylaxis, and a 10-item questionnaire to assess physicians' knowledge of anaphylaxis. Results Out of 121 primary healthcare physicians, 61.2% were male, and 47.9% were aged between 25 and 35 years. Nearly all physicians (97.5%) believed that anaphylaxis is a life-threatening situation. The overall mean knowledge score was 4.74 out of 10 points. Nearly half (48.8%) were categorized as having poor knowledge levels, 43% as moderate, and only 8.3% as having good knowledge. Being specialists/consultants and being trained in managing anaphylaxis were the factors associated with increased knowledge. Conclusion The knowledge of primary care physicians regarding anaphylaxis was deficient. However, increased knowledge of anaphylaxis was seen more frequently among consultants or specialists who attended training for managing anaphylaxis cases. A multi-center study involving a bigger sample size is needed to establish physicians' knowledge of anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.