ArticleCureus2024
Development and Application of a Novel Machine Learning Model Predicting Pancreatic Cancer-Specific Mortality.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment of prediction model for mortality risk of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise prognostication is vital for guiding treatment decisions in people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Existing models depend on predetermined variables, constraining their effectiveness. Our objective was to explore a novel machine learning approach to enhance a prognostic model for predicting pancreatic cancer-specific mortality and, subsequently, to assess its performance against Cox regression models. Datasets were retrospectively collected and analyzed for 9,752 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and with surgery performed. The primary outcomes were the mortality of patients with pancreatic carcinoma at one year, three years, and five years. Model discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), and calibration was assessed using Brier scores. The Survival Quilts model was compared with Cox regression models in clinical use, and decision curve analysis was done. The Survival Quilts model demonstrated robust discrimination for one-year (C-index 0.729), three-year (C-index 0.693), and five-year (C-index 0.672) pancreatic cancer-specific mortality. In comparison to Cox models, the Survival Quilts models exhibited a higher C-index up to 32 months but displayed inferior performance after 33 months. A subgroup analysis was conducted, revealing that within the subset of individuals without metastasis, the Survival Quilts models showcased a significant advantage over the Cox models. In the cohort with metastatic pancreatic cancer, Survival Quilts outperformed the Cox model before 24 months but exhibited a weaker performance after 25 months. This study has developed and validated a novel machine learning-based Survival Quilts model to predict pancreatic cancer-specific mortality that outperforms the Cox regression model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.