ReviewCureus2024
Exploring the Evolution of Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative outcomes and anesthetic challenges of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Review
- Managing obstetric and gynecologic complications in obese women: Evidence-Based Strategies for Optimizing Outcomes and Reducing Risks.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Review
- Robotic surgery: bibliometric analysis, continental distribution, and co-words analysis from 2001 to 2023.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Advancements in Surgical Approaches for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Advancements and Innovations in the Surgical Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery has emerged as a transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology, offering enhanced precision and minimally invasive techniques for various procedures. This paper explores the evolution of robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology, examining its historical development, current applications, and prospects. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and case studies, we highlight the benefits of robotic surgery, including reduced trauma, improved patient outcomes, and increased surgeon capabilities. However, cost, training requirements, and regulatory concerns hinder widespread adoption. Continuing technological innovation is expected to enhance the efficacy and applicability of robotic-assisted procedures. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, researchers, and industry stakeholders is essential to address these challenges and ensure optimal patient care. By embracing the opportunities presented by robotic surgery while addressing associated challenges, practitioners and researchers can contribute to the continued advancement of this transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.