ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Distribution, Quality, and Educational Value of Videos Related to Knee Instability Exercises on the Social Media Platform TikTok.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physical Activity Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- #KneeOsteotomy: Evaluation of the Quality and Educational Value of TikTok Videos.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Social Media Short-Form Video Content for Patient Education on Vision-Threatening Diseases.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- #Cartilage: TikTok Videos on Cartilage Surgery Demonstrate Low Quality and Limited Educational Value.Cartilage · 2025Article
- Descriptive analysis of TikTok content on vaccination in Arabic.AIMS public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction TikTok, a globally popular short-form video platform, offers a unique space for healthcare professionals to share advice, particularly under common conditions such as knee pain or instability. Despite its popularity, doubts persist regarding the reliability of medical information disseminated on TikTok. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of TikTok videos as a source of patient information on knee instability, recognizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of potential misinformation on this influential social media platform. Methods A search for "knee stability exercises" on TikTok yielded 448 videos, of which 187 met the inclusion criteria. These videos were categorized by source and evaluated using the Knee Exercise Education Scoring Tool (KEEST) and an information analysis questionnaire, DISCERN. Results General user videos (69.84%) had notably lower DISCERN scores than healthcare professional videos (29.1%) across all categories (P < 0.001, P = 0.282, P = 0.131, and P = 0.010). The DISCERN scores were inversely linked to video metrics (views, likes, comments, favorites, and shares). General user videos were largely of poor quality (66.4%), whereas healthcare professional videos spanned poor (61.8%), fair (28.2%), good (9.1%), and excellent (1.8%) categories. Both general users (12.31/25) and healthcare professionals (12.18/25) exhibited average quality according to KEEST standards (P = 0.809), with an intriguing inverse correlation between video popularity and DISCERN score. Conclusion Healthcare professionals demonstrated superior evidence-based content (DISCERN), whereas both groups were comparatively educated on treatment plans and effects (KEEST). TikTok's prevalent knee instability videos lack quality, proper sourcing, treatment risk information, and explanation. Moreover, popularity is inversely correlated with quality, and healthcare professionals appear to offer better evidence-based content. TikTok's role in healthcare highlights the importance of ensuring accurate information and implementing content quality regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.