ArticleCureus2024
Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn as a Consequence of Vitamin K Refusal Due to Language Barrier.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin K Prophylaxis in Newborns: A Narrative Review of the Molecular Basis, Clinical Evidence, and Comparative Effectiveness of Intramuscular Versus Oral Administration and Parental Hesitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Large intracerebral hemorrhage in the setting of vitamin K prophylaxis refusal.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborns are prone to hemorrhagic disease due to vitamin K deficiency for multiple reasons, including vitamin K absence in breast milk and formula preparation, sterile gut with limited absorption, and lack of placental transfer. Despite the importance of vitamin K administration at birth in preventing hemorrhagic disease in infants, some parents still refuse administration to their newborns. One of the unexpected but preventable reasons is the language barrier related to special dialects, resulting in misunderstanding the benefits of vitamin K administration and complications related to vitamin K deficiency. We present a case of hemorrhagic disease of the newborn due to vitamin K deficiency following the parental refusal of postnatal prophylactic vitamin K due to a language barrier that resulted in miscommunication. Although appropriate education was provided to the family via Spanish interpreter as requested, it was later revealed that the family was speaking a special dialect, and they did not fully understand the importance of vitamin K prophylaxis. The patient experienced intracranial hemorrhage with full recovery after treatment and surgical intervention. Upon reviewing the case, the parents were speaking a rare dialect of Spanish, that was not known to the Spanish medical interpreters. A combination of a Spanish medical translator and a family friend was necessary for effective communication with the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.