Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681211›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology open

Alike but not the same: Psychological profiles of COVID-19 vaccine skeptics.

Ursula Voss, Karin Schermelleh-Engel, Leana Hauser, Mira Holzmann, Diana Fichtner, Sonja Seifert, Ansgar Klimke, Sabine Windmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ursula VossGoethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1272-9934
Karin Schermelleh-EngelGoethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-0803
Leana HauserVITOS Hochtaunus Psychiatric Hospital, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Mira HolzmannGroningen University, Groningen, Netherlands.
Diana FichtnerVITOS Hochtaunus Psychiatric Hospital, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Sonja SeifertVITOS Hochtaunus Psychiatric Hospital, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Ansgar KlimkeVITOS Hochtaunus Psychiatric Hospital, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Sabine WindmannGoethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-7526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the challenges of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was a widespread skepticism about vaccination. To elucidate the underlying mental and emotional predispositions, we examined a sample of 1428 participants using latent profile analysis (LPA) on selected personality trait variables, mental health status, and measures of irrational beliefs. LPA revealed five distinct profiles: two classes of non-skeptics and three of skeptics. The smaller non-skeptic class reported the highest rates of mental health problems, along with high levels of neuroticism, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, and external locus of control. The larger non-skeptic class was psychologically well-balanced. Conversely, the skeptic groups shared strong distrust of COVID-19 vaccination but differed in emotional and mental profiles, leading to graded differences in endorsing extreme conspiracy beliefs. This suggests that vaccine skepticism is not solely a result of mental illness or emotional instability; rather extreme skepticism manifests as a nuanced, graded phenomenon contingent on personality traits and conspirational beliefs.

Indexed as

conspiracyCOVID-19latent profile analysispandemicpsychological profilesscale constructionvaccine skepticism

Identifiers

PMID38681211
PMCPMC11047032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.