Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681157›Full record

ReviewPOCUS journal2024

Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus.

Brandon Oto, Robert Baeten, Leon Chen, Puja Dalal, Ria Dancel, Steven Fox, Carl William Lange Iv, Cameron Baston, Paul Bornemann, Siddharth Dugar and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in POCUS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Brandon OtoBridgeport Hospital, Yale New Haven Health Bridgeport, CT USA.
Robert BaetenPiedmont Heart Institute Atlanta , GA USA.
Leon ChenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY USA.
Puja DalalNovant Health Cornelius, NC USA.
Ria DancelUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Steven FoxUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL USA.
Carl William Lange IvPhelps Health Rolla, MO USA.
Cameron BastonPenn Medicine Philadelphia, PA USA.
Paul BornemannLexington Medical Center West Columbia, SC USA.
Siddharth DugarCleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH USA.
Andrew GoldsmithBrigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA USA.
Meghan Kelly HerbstUConn Health Farmington, CT USA.
James N KirkpatrickUniversity of Washington Seattle, WA USA.
Abhilash KoratalaMedical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee , WI USA.
Michael J LanspaIntermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah Murray , UT USA.
Viveta LoboStanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA USA.
Jason T NomuraChristiana Care Health System Newark , DE USA.
Aliaksei PustavoitauJohns Hopkins University Baltimore , MD USA.
Mourad H SenussiTexas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, TX USA.
Vincent L SorrellGill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY USA.
Frances Mae WestThomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia, PA USA.
Aarti SarwalWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in contemporary medical practice and the existence of clinical guidelines addressing its specific applications, there remains a lack of standardization and agreement on optimal practices for several areas of POCUS use. The Society of Point of Care Ultrasound (SPOCUS) formed a working group in 2022 to establish a set of recommended best practices for POCUS, applicable to clinicians regardless of their training, specialty, resource setting, or scope of practice. Using a three-round modified Delphi process, a multi-disciplinary panel of 22 POCUS experts based in the United States reached consensus on 57 statements in domains including: (1) The definition and clinical role of POCUS; (2) Training pathways; (3) Credentialing; (4) Cleaning and maintenance of POCUS devices; (5) Consent and education; (6) Security, storage, and sharing of POCUS studies; (7) Uploading, archiving, and reviewing POCUS studies; and (8) Documenting POCUS studies. The consensus statements are provided here. While not intended to establish a standard of care or supersede more targeted guidelines, this document may serve as a useful baseline to guide clinicians, leaders, and systems considering initiation or enhancement of POCUS programs.

Indexed as

Best PracticeClinical UltrasoundConsensusEmergency ultrasoundGuidelinesPOCUSSonography

Identifiers

PMID38681157
PMCPMC11044939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.