Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38681135›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2024

Leading Quality and Safety on the Frontline - A Case Study of Department Leaders in Nursing Homes.

Malin Rosell Magerøy, Geir Sverre Braut, Carl Macrae, Robyn Clay-Williams, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Siri Wiig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Translation of the agency for health care research and quality nursing home survey on patient safety for Swedish conditions.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malin Rosell MagerøySHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-2574
Geir Sverre BrautDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Carl MacraeSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Siri WiigSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The role of healthcare leaders is becoming increasingly complex, and carries great responsibility for patients, employees, and the quality of service delivery. This study explored the barriers and enablers that department leaders in nursing homes encounter when managing the dual responsibilities in Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) and Quality and Patient Safety (QPS). Methodology: Case study design with data collected through semi structured interviews with 16 department leaders in five Norwegian municipalities. We analyzed the data using qualitative content analysis. Results: Data analysis resulted in four themes explaining what department leaders in nursing homes experience as barriers and enablers when handling the dual responsibility of HSE and QPS: Temporal capacity: The importance of having enough time to create a health-promoting work environment that ensures patient safety. Relational capacity: Relationships have an impact on work process and outcomes. Professional competence: Competence affects patient safety and leadership strategies. Organizational structure: Organizational frameworks influence how the dual responsibilities are handled. Conclusion: Evidence from this study showed that external contextual factors (eg, legislations and finances) and internal factors (eg, relationships and expectations) are experienced as barriers and enablers when department leaders are enacting the dual responsibility of HSE and QPS. Of these, relationships were found to be the most significant contributor.

Indexed as

human factorsleadershippatient safetyqualitystaff safety

Identifiers

PMID38681135
PMCPMC11055517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.