ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Bacteria from nodules of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-Microbiome Interactions in Medicinal Plants: A Synergistic Partnership for Biomass Production and Secondary Metabolite Accumulation.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Distribution characteristics of endophytic bacteria and endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria in Vicia faba root nodules in Rocky desertification areas of Southwest China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Great diverse rhizobial community nodulatingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: In the present study, Illumina-based 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate the endophytic bacterial communities of root nodules of AM at five sampling sites in Guangxi. In addition, 179 strains of endophytic bacteria were isolated and categorized into 13 haplotypes based on recA sequence analysis. Results: The phylogeny of the 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed a predominance of nonrhizobial endophytes. Microbial diversity analysis showed that Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in all samples, while Bradyrhizobium was the dominant genus in different samples. An efficient strain, Discussion: This study provides insights into the complex microbial diversity of AM nodules and provides strain information for the efficient cultivation of AM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.