Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680843›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Target motion misjudgments reflect a misperception of the background; revealed using continuous psychophysics.

Michael Falconbridge, Robert L Stamps, Mark Edwards, David R Badcock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael FalconbridgeSchool of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-2597
Robert L StampsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Mark EdwardsResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
David R BadcockSchool of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-435X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the velocities of target objects as we navigate complex environments is made more difficult by the fact that our own motion adds systematic motion signals to the visual scene. The flow-parsing hypothesis asserts that the background motion is subtracted from visual scenes in such cases as a way for the visual system to determine target motions relative to the scene. Here, we address the question of why backgrounds are only

Indexed as

higher-order motionmodelsoptic flowperceptionperception/action

Identifiers

PMID38680843
PMCPMC11046177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.